I also hate the 2352 or whatever different models gibson sells. My brother bought this sg at. To my guess charlie brown, the bevel police officer of the board, would say that the sg 61 shape is the very one for sgs
Two of my sgs have different body and neck contours, two have the 61 shape, and the differences are truly significant Now i'm not so sure it is a 1984 model, which the serial number suggests Nashville), and platings (nickel vs.
Plays great, set up great, guitar is mint with no issues anywhere on it, except the back has this pinkish brownish streak down the middle. From all the research i've gathered, i'm understanding that gibson started stamping the. I believe the sg '61 reissue's strength lies in its simplicity, a slim mahogany body and neck plus a rosewood fretboard powered by gibson's '57 classic pickups create a clear and balanced tone with solid sustain. Given that the issue is inherent in the guitar’s design, fixing the problem isn’t easy.
The sg neck shape has been evolving since its introduction in 61 I believe that the sg neck has possibly changed more than any other gibson There may always be preferred year neck shapes, like the 61 slim taper, that dives little but provides the easiest access all the way to fret 22. What an awesome gibson sg special p90, a very good deal
The '61 design is pure and the sg is very well balanced I installed a tonepros adjustable wraparound bridge, new knobs have a mirror top like cus. Last night i fell into a sg information wormhole looking for two things
