11 there are multiple ways of writing out a given complex number, or a number in general And while $1$ to a large power is 1, a number very close to 1 to a large power can be anything. The complex numbers are a field
There are infinitely many possible values for $1^i$, corresponding to different branches of the complex logarithm The reason why $1^\infty$ is indeterminate, is because what it really means intuitively is an approximation of the type $ (\sim 1)^ {\rm large \, number}$ The confusing point here is that the formula $1^x = 1$ is not part of the definition of complex exponentiation, although it is an immediate consequence of the definition of natural number exponentiation.
Is there a proof for it or is it just assumed? How do i convince someone that $1+1=2$ may not necessarily be true I once read that some mathematicians provided a very length proof of $1+1=2$ Can you think of some way to
49 actually 1 was considered a prime number until the beginning of 20th century Unique factorization was a driving force beneath its changing of status, since it's formulation is quickier if 1 is not considered a prime But i think that group theory was the other force. 注1ļ¼ćć代蔨软件äøēåč½ęå 注2ļ¼åäøå°ēµčļ¼åŖéč¦č®¾ē½®äøę¬”ļ¼ä»„åé½åÆä»„ē“ę„ä½æēØ ę³Ø3ļ¼å¦ęč§å¾åå 设置ēę ¼å¼äøęÆčŖå·±ę³č¦ēļ¼åÆä»„ē»§ē»ē¹å»ćå¤ēŗ§å蔨ćāāćå®ä¹ę°å¤ēŗ§å蔨ćļ¼ę¾å°ēøåŗēä½ē½®čæč”äæ®ę¹
However, i'm still curious why there is 1 way to permute 0 things, instead of 0 ways.