The eu and us have more specific legal frameworks and established case law around ai copyright, while china’s laws are less developed and more ambiguous Each regulatory system reflects distinct cultural, political and economic perspectives. Core challenges include authorship, origina ity, human input assessment, and legal compatibility
The eu, us, and china adopt distinct but complementary approaches, shaped by their legal traditions Within the us, we explore ai regulation at both the federal and state level, with a focus on california’s pending senate bill 1047 To address these issues, the study proposes
To solve the ai dilemma Compare ai regulatory frameworks across the eu, china, and usa with expert analysis of compliance requirements, enforcement mechanisms, and strategic approaches for global ai governance. This paper compares three distinct approaches taken by the eu, china and the us
